STUDENT LEARNING MOTIVATION FROM AN EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY PERSPECTIVE LITERATURE REVIEW ON THEORY, DETERMINANT FACTORS, AND TEACHER INTERVENTION STRATEGIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66303/pvje0776

Keywords:

Self-efficacy, Teacher, motivation, Psychology

Abstract

Learning motivation is a key factor in determining the quality of students' learning processes and outcomes and is a primary focus in educational psychology studies. Various theories and empirical findings indicate that learning motivation is influenced by complex interactions between internal factors in students and external factors in the learning environment, particularly the role of teachers. The purpose of this article is to comprehensively examine student learning motivation from an educational psychology perspective through a literature review covering key theories, determinants, and teacher intervention strategies. The method used is a literature review by examining relevant scientific articles, academic books, and reputable publications from 2000–2024. The results of the study indicate that self-determination theory, expectancy-value theory, and self-efficacy are the dominant conceptual frameworks in explaining learning motivation. Motivational determinants include self-efficacy, self-regulation, task value, the quality of teacher-student relationships, and classroom climate. Effective teacher intervention strategies include supportive learning for autonomy, formative feedback, cooperative learning, and a growth mindset approach. This study confirms that learning motivation is dynamic and can be enhanced through planned and theory-based pedagogical interventions.

References

1. Schunk DH, Pintrich PR, Meece JL. Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications. 3rd ed. Pearson; 2008. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165837

2. Wigfield A, Eccles JS. Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000;25(1):68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

3. Maslow AH. Motivation and Personality. 3rd ed. Harper & Row; 1987. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271625628500159

4. McClelland DC. The Achieving Society. Van Nostrand; 1961. https://doi.org/10.1037/14359-000

5. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can Psychol. 2008;49(3):182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801

6. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

7. Zimmerman BJ. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educ Psychol. 1990;25(1):3–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2

8. Wentzel KR. Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. J Educ Psychol. 1998;90(2):202–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.202

9. Zusho A, Pintrich PR. Socioculturalization of achievement goal theory and research. Educ Psychol. 2003;38(3):135–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3803_1

10. Niemiec CP, Ryan RM. Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory Res Educ. 2009;7(2):133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318

11. Reeve J. Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educ Psychol. 2009;44(3):159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990

12. Liem GAD, Martin AJ. Motivation and engagement in learning: A review of theory, measurement, and intervention. Aust Educ Res. 2012;39(4):459–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0066-x

13. Lazowski RA, Hulleman CS. Motivation interventions in education: A meta-analytic review. Rev Educ Res. 2016;86(2):602–640. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315617832

14. Eccles JS, Wigfield A. Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53(1):109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

15. MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

16. Snyder H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2019;104:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

17. Booth A, Sutton A, Papaioannou D. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications; 2016. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529012132

18. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7): e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

19. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

20. Skinner BF. The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1938. https://doi.org/10.1037/10584-000

21. Cooper JO, Heron TE, Heward WL. Applied Behavior Analysis. 3rd ed. Pearson; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290102600208.

22. Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(6):627–668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627.

23. Weiner B. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychol Rev. 1985;92(4):548–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548.

24. Dweck CS. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House; 2006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040

25. Vansteenkiste M, Lens W, Deci EL. Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory. Educ Psychol. 2006;41(1):19–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4

26. Pajares F. Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Rev Educ Res. 1996;66(4):543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543

Downloads

Published

2026-06-06