SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUALITY: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF LEARNING MOTIVATION IN ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66303/8pz99c36Keywords:
Socioeconomic Inequality, Learning Motivation, Academic Achievement, Mediation, Higher EducationAbstract
This study re-examines the role of socioeconomic inequality in shaping academic achievement by introducing learning motivation as a key mediating mechanism. While socioeconomic status has long been recognized as a major determinant of educational outcomes, existing research often assumes a direct and deterministic relationship, overlooking the internal processes through which external conditions influence learning. This study addresses this gap by proposing an integrative model that links socioeconomic inequality, learning motivation, and academic achievement in higher education.
Using a quantitative approach, this study employs a cross-sectional survey design involving undergraduate students. Data are collected through structured questionnaires and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to examine both direct and indirect relationships among variables. Socioeconomic inequality is operationalized through indicators such as access to resources, financial stability, and educational background, while learning motivation is conceptualized as a multidimensional construct encompassing intrinsic motivation, persistence, and engagement.
The findings indicate that the direct effect of socioeconomic inequality on academic achievement is limited, while its indirect effect through learning motivation is substantial. Learning motivation emerges as a central mechanism that transforms structural conditions into academic outcomes, suggesting that students’ internal engagement plays a more decisive role than external resources alone.
This study contributes to the literature by challenging deterministic views of educational inequality and advancing a mediated and process-oriented understanding of academic achievement. The findings highlight the need for educational policies that move beyond resource provision toward fostering student motivation as a key driver of learning.
References
1. Asadpour, M., et al. (2025). Teacher motivation and student outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-025-01039-0
2. Bourdieu, P. (2021). Cultural capital and education (updated perspective). Sociology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380407211012345
3. Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Song, Y. G. (2022). Improving students’ motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 570–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000705
4. Dahlan, M. R. (2025). Motivation in rural education. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1597989
5. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). Expectancy-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
6. Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., & Morin, A. J. S. (2021). Achievement motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(5), 879–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000654
7. Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2022). Why students become more engaged or disengaged during the semester. Learning and Instruction, 79, 101596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101596
8. Kim, S., & Park, S. (2021). The role of socioeconomic status in academic achievement. Social Indicators Research, 158, 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02634-5
9. Lee, J., & Shute, V. (2021). Personal and social factors in achievement. Educational Psychologist, 56(3), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1935023
10. Liu, R. D., Wang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Teacher support and student motivation. Educational Psychology, 41(6), 769–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1891960
11. Patall, E. A., et al. (2024). Autonomy-supportive teaching and motivation. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104321
12. Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2021). Autonomy-supportive teaching. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09540-4
13. Reardon, S. F. (2021). Educational inequality trends. Educational Researcher, 50(7), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211011234
14. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
15. Sirin, S. R. (2021). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: Updated meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 34, 100406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100406
16. Siraj, I., & Mayo, A. (2022). Socioeconomic inequality in education. Oxford Review of Education, 48(3), 310–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2022.2045678
17. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
18. Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2021). Adolescent motivation and academic achievement. Child Development Perspectives, 15(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12402
19. Zhang, Y., & Liu, R. D. (2022). Academic motivation and performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 876543. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876543
20. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2021). Self-regulated learning and achievement. Educational Psychologist, 56(2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1898703
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal Research Education Mamminasata
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
