The Role of Traditional Sports Games in Developing Cooperation and Sportsmanship
Keywords:
traditional sports games, cooperation, sportsmanship, physical education, elementary schoolAbstract
Background: Physical education learning in elementary schools has not fully optimized culturally based approaches to instill cooperation and sportsmanship values, even though these values are essential for shaping students’ social character from an early age. Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the role of traditional sports games in developing cooperation and sportsmanship among students at UPTD SDN 144 Barru.
Methods: This study employed a descriptive qualitative design involving students from grades IV, V, and VI, a physical education teacher, and the school principal. Data were collected through structured observation, semi-structured interviews, and documentation of learning activities. Data analysis was conducted through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, supported by source and technique triangulation to ensure data validity. Results: The findings indicated that the implementation of traditional sports games such as gobak sodor, bentengan, and tug of war enhanced students’ cooperation through group communication, role distribution, and team strategies, while fostering sportsmanship through rule compliance, honesty, and fair acceptance of winning and losing.
Conclusion: Traditional sports games are effective learning media in physical education for developing cooperation and sportsmanship among elementary school students.
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
Dyson, B., Griffin, L. L., & Hastie, P. A. (2004). Sport education, tactical games, and cooperative learning: Theoretical and pedagogical considerations. Quest, 56(2), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2004.10491823
Gallahue, D. L., Ozmun, J. C., & Goodway, J. D. (2012). Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Hellison, D. (2011). Teaching personal and social responsibility through physical activity (3rd ed.). Human Kinetics.
Holt, N. L., & Neely, K. C. (2011). Positive youth development through sport: A review. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología del Ejercicio y el Deporte, 6(2), 299–316.
Jarrett, O. S., & Waite-Stupiansky, S. (2009). Play, child development, and relationships. American Journal of Play, 1(4), 371–393.
Kirk, D. (2010). Physical education futures. Routledge.
Lavega, P., Alonso, J. I., Etxebeste, J., Lagardera, F., & March, J. (2014). Relationship between traditional games and the intensity of emotions experienced by participants. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85(4), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2014.961048
Ntoumanis, N., & Standage, M. (2009). Motivation in physical education classes. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104324
Pill, S. (2016). Implementing game sense coaching in physical education and sport. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 16(1), 75–82.
Rink, J. E. (2013). Teaching physical education for learning (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Siedentop, D., Hastie, P. A., & Van der Mars, H. (2011). Complete guide to sport education (2nd ed.). Human Kinetics.
Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
UNESCO. (2015). Quality physical education guidelines for policy-makers. UNESCO Publishing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal Research Education Mamminasata
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
